Hindus Arise ~ Islam and Pseudo-Secularists

" Writing is an affirmation, not only of the individual but, through him, of the nameless and voiceless multitude, who must rely on him to define the validity of their right to be" —Andre Brink

Shradha Prakashan 129-B, DDA Falls MIG, Rajori Garden New Deihi-27 Rs. 10/-

Islam and Pseudo-Secularists

In view of the widespread Islamic terror it has become necessary to find out the root cause of this violent behaviour of Muslims. Many Hindu apologists of Islam try to explain away every act of Islamic barbarianism, such as recent Islamic attack on innocent Hindus at Akshardham temple, on the basis of some fraudulent provocation stories. These stories were floated on Internet, electronic and print media by pseudo-secularists. They tried to shift onus of responsibility not on the Muslims but on the victims. Ghodhra arson incidence is one more example of this deceitful propaganda practice of pseudo-secular press.

The questions to be pondered upon are: Are the incidences such as attack on the New York WTC and on innocent civilians in Israel, Kashmir, Ghodhra, Bali and Timor isolated events of Islamic terror? Or is there an existence of a globally well-established 'Kafir-Jihad' behavior pattern throughout the Islamic history?

Those who try to justify Islamic violence on the basis of concocted provocation theories are moral criminals. Indirectly supporting Islamic terror in its endeavor are the newspaper editors, powerful politicians and pseudo-secular 'Dhimmis' who at the same time deceitfully hide away the real, ultimate and so-called divine source of such violent acts. They must be exposed.

Let us have a look at The Koran in which the Allah commands:

1. We shall say, 'Lay hold of him and bind him. Burn him in the fire of Hell, then fasten him with a chain of 70 cubits long. For he did not believe in Allah (69:30-33)

2. Lo! Those who disbelieve our revelations, we shall expose them to fire. As often their skins are consumed we shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment. (4:56)

3. Garments of fire have been prepared for unbelievers. Scalding water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that, which is in their bellies. They shall be lashed with red-hot iron. (22:19-21)

4. Lo! Ye and that which ye worship besides Allah are fuel of Hell (21:98)

5..... award of Allah's enemies, The fire. Therein is their immortal home. (41:28)

6. Allah has cursed the unbelievers and proposed for them a blazing Hell (33:60)

7. Unbelievers are enemies of Allah and they will roast in Hell. (41:14)

8. I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads.... (8:12)

9.......slay the idol worshipers wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush every where for them...(9:5)

10. Believers! Make war on the infidels who dwell around you... (9:123)

What else Muslims need to get provoked? Is the Koran not sufficient to provoke them into the above prescribed violent actions? Entire Koran is a manual on Jihad. We request every honest intellectual to buy and read the Koran so that they can see for themselves the truth of pseudo-secular propaganda that all religions preach peace and brotherhood and thus can cure themselves of Gandhi's-syndrome, The "Sarva Dharma Sambhava", which in reality means "Dharam Adharm Sambhava". On what basis Islam can be defined as Dharma?

Gandhi says, "The Islam is a noble faith." Wonder!! Whom should we believe, Koran or Gandhi? To reconcile both of them, the only alternative left is to surrender one's rational faculty at the altar of political correctness and conformity and thus develop a schizophrenic split personality in the bargain. That is exactly what happened to congress-party after Muslims forced the partition upon India through 'Direct Action' riots. After independence congress party institutionalised this schizophrenic split as the principle of secularism and therefore created the double standards of political behaviour. For Muslims the policy of appeasement and for Hindus the policy of denial.

Now as a consequence of these policies, a spectre of deep neurosis is haunting the entire national media and polity. The 'obsessive-compulsive' pseudo-secular behaviour of national media can only be explained in psychopathological terms. It is indeed neurosis, which blinds them to see the obvious fact. That the foundation of Indian secularism rests upon the sands of Gandhian falsehood - "The Islam is a noble faith". The state incorporated this false assumption into its policy without critically examining it. Over the time, false assumptions lead to contradictions and conflict with reality. This is, what is happening all around us and manifesting in the breakdown of law and order, but it is the collapse of the false assumption of the State - that "Islam is a noble faith". In fact, this false assumption of nobility of Islam collapsed in 1947 itself evident in the partition of the country, then again in Kashmir and now ironically in Gandhi's own province.

There is plenty of evidence to show that the Muslim behaviour pattern and the mindset have remained unchanged even in the years after 1947. We have witnessed increasing incidence of street riots staged by the same sort of Muslim hooligans, on the same sort of petty pretexts as in the years preceding Partition. Muslim spokesman, no matter what political platform they use, have levelled the same sort of accusations, namely, that the Muslims are a 'poor and persecuted minority' entirely at mercy of a 'brute Hindu majority'; that 'Muslim lives, properties and honour' are not safe in the midst of a rising tide of 'Hindu communalism'; and that 'Hindu chauvinism' is seeking to wipe out all vestiges of Muslim religion and culture. It is the Pirpur report of pre-partition Muslim League against Hindus all over once again in Independent India. This is secularism at the cost of Hindu culture, society and nation.

Moreover, in pseudo-secular view, the burden of maintaining communal harmony rests entirely on Hindus. It is high time to ask Muslims, what have they done to share this burden after partitioning India in the name of Islam? What has been the Muslim contribution in maintenance of communal harmony in Independent India? Does Secularism mean clamouring for special rights and privileges in a secular and democratic State? Is secularism analogous to a one-way traffic?

"It is also an undeniable fact that while the Muslims, especially the elite, expect the Hindus to protect them, they failed to protect the Hindus during the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus in Jammu and Kashmir. This cannot go on forever." (Rajaram NS.)

After partition of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have become Islamic fix deposits but India is a joint current account that can be operated at will. In independent India, the secularism has degenerated into an instrument in the hands of militant Muslims and Nehruvian establishment to blackmail and harass Hindu majority. The political and cultural oppression in the name of secularism is now unacceptable to Hindus and Shri Ram Janam-Bhoomi movement is the expression of this change.

Double standards of Islam with regard to minorities

The evil coalition of Muslim fanatics, communists and pseudo-secular media has launched a propaganda war against Hindus to defame India. Minorities in India enjoy complete freedom and equality and have full rights for maintaining and spreading their culture, their educational institutions are aided by government and their Mosques are free from any government interference. They enjoy separate civil laws in accordance with the Shariat and have separate constitutional body "The Minority Commission" to protect their rights.

Here is just one example of their privilege -"while Hindu pilgrims to Shri Amarnath have to pay a special tax to finance the security provided by the Government, Muslims receive a subsidy for going on pilgrimage to Mecca at the rate of Rs. 16000/- per head. This reveals how crores of rupees of Hindu taxpayers are spent every year to render an altogether uncalled-for service to those who go on Hajj. The Hajj allowance is the result of the Hajj bill which Nehru (the don of pseudo-secularism) himself introduced in the parliament, in 1959..." (Dr. Koenraad Elst, Decolonising the Hindu Mind).

This is just one of the glaring cases of pseudo-secularism and anti-Hinduism indulged in by the State itself.

Compare this freedom and privilege enjoyed by Muslims in India with condition of minorities in Islamic theocratic states. The constitutional and economic generosity offered by Hindu majority and their state is never reciprocated by Islamic states by giving similar rights to minorities in their territories. One more example will illustrate the contrast.

"Mr. Sunil Wadhera, a Hindu, died an accident in Saudi Arabia. In case of death like this, every Muslim gets a compensation of 6 lacks dinars. But Wadhera's family was given only 1700 dinars in compensation, even when the insurance company had paid the full amount. It was said that as Wadhera was a Kafir, the value of his life was no more a paltry sum. This is the Islamic law of Saudi Arabia"... {ibid)

What is significant, however, is that even against such an inhuman outrageous affront, there were no so-called secular organisations that could raise their voice on behalf of the Hindu. All these pseudo-secular gorillas went into hiding. It will make much sense if pseudo-secular media exercise their good efforts for removing this asymmetry of minority rights between India and Islamic states, instead of wasting their energy on making baseless complaints against the Hindus. Now let us have a fleeting look at the history of Islamic crimes against humanity.

On History -The Islamic Dark Age: A catalogue of crimes

Since 712 AD parts of India have been under the Islamic theocratic rule, that is almost for 1200 years, in this Islamic dark age Hindus were killed, plundered, taxed, enslaved, raped and sold by foreign Muslim invaders, for whom the Jihad against idolater Hindus was religious duty dictated by the word of Allah, as stated in Koran. The world famous historian Will Durant writes, "Mohammedan conquest of India was probably the bloodiest story in history "...(The story of Civilization /vol.1 /Neiv York/1972). Looked at from the point of view of Islam it was a dazzling period indeed, as faithfully recorded by the Muslim court historians... (Elliot and Dozvson: History of India as told by its own Historians, 8 vols., New Delhi reprint 1990, London 1867-77)

Islam had the immense satisfaction of :

1. Sending millions of accursed idolater Hindu Kafirs to hell by killing them in a millennium long Jihad.

2. Converting millions of Hindus by force.

3. Killing thousands of native scholars, Hindu and Jain sadhus and Buddhist bhikshus and burning their sacrpd books, libraries and universities.

4. Demolishing and desecrating thousands of Hindu and Jain temples and building mosque over them with the materials of destroyed temples.

5. Killing cows and forcing Hindus to eat beef.

6. Capturing millions of innocent Hindu men, women and children and selling them in to slavery and concubinage in the far flung Islamic world.

7. Violating the chastity of Hindu women and forcing them into Muslim harems or forcing them into prostitution, and thus degrading them in to sex-slaves.

8. Castrating, that is removing and mutilating sexual organs of handsome young male slaves, and transforming them into GHILMAN and EUNUCHS (hijiras) for the purpose of homosexual and other harem services.

9. Collecting vast amounts of loot and distributing it among Muslims according to the rules laid down and exemplified by the prophet himself.

10. Imposing exploitative religious tax the Jizyah on Hindus.

11. Establishing the truth of The Koran by power of sword instead of logic, debates and discourses.

Just a few random examples from the history of Islam will illustrate the above-mentioned points:

* Construction of Masjid Quwwatul Islam (might of Islam) was commenced by Aibak in 1195. It was built with materials and gold obtained by destroying 27 Hindu and Jain temples in Delhi and Its neighborhood. A Persian inscription in the mosque testifies to this, it is reproduced in, Thomas/ Chronicles of the Pathan Kings of Delhi/p. 22-23.

* Kazi Mughith ad Din told Sultan Alauddin Khalj "If the Jizyah-collector asks a Hindu for a silver, the later should offer gold in all humility. If the tax collector wishes to spit in to Hindu's mouth, the Hindu should open his mouth without demur, so as to enable the Muslim tax collector to spit into Hindu's mouth". (Diya ad-Din Barani/ Tarikh-I Firozshahi/ Sayyid Athar Abbas Rizwi/ selected Hindi translation in his Khalji- kalina Bharata/ Aligarh/1955/ p.70).

* In 1679, Aurangzeb reintroduced Jizyah tax on Hindus at the usual rates of 48 Dhirams on the rich, 24 on the middle class, and 12 on the poor. Following the Islamic tradition, he also stipulated that Dhimmi (the second class Hindu citizen under Muslim rule) should carry the Jizyah tax with his own hand and should come on foot. Hindu Dhimmis should pay tax standing, while Muslim Jizyah-collector is sitting. The Hindu Dhimmi's hand should be below that of the collector, who should snatch away the tax from the Hindu's hands with this specific remark, "Pay the Jizyah, O Dhimmi!" (Mirza Muhammad Hasan/ (ed) By Sayyid Nawab Ali, Gaekwad's Oriental series, No. xxxiii, Baroda, 1928, vol-I p.296-297).

* "It was not only Jahangir, a comparatively kind hearted emperor, who used to capture poor Hindu people during his hunting expeditions and send them to Kabul in exchange for dogs and horses; all Muslim rulers and governors collected Hindu slaves and exploited them ... Under Shahjahn, peasants were compelled to sell their women and children to meet the revenue demand"...(K.S.Lal, Muslim Slave System in Medieval India/ Aditya Prakashan, p.73)

* "Abdulla Khan Uzbeg's force destroyed all towns in the Kalpi-Kanauj area, be-headed the men, took away all their goods, their wives and children as slaves". (Abul Fazl/Akbar Nama, ii, 195-96). Abdulla Khan Uzbeg once declared that "I made prisoners of five lacs of Hindu Kafir men and women and sold them. They all became Mohammadans, from their progeny there will be crores of Faithful Muslims by the day of judgement."... (Shah Nawaz Khan, Maasir-ul-Umara, i/ p.105).

* About the large scale distribution of Hindu girl slaves on the occasion of celebration of Muslim festival of Id, Ibn Battuta writes: "First of all, daughters of Kafir Hindu Rajas captured during course of the year, come and sing and dance. Thereafter they are bestowed upon Amirs and important foreigners. After this, daughters of other Kafirs dance and sing... The Sultan gives them to his relatives. On the day after Id the Darbar is held in a similar fashion. Female singers are brought out... The Sultan distributes them among the Muslim officers..." (Ibn Battuta /63). "Thousands of Hindu women were distributed in the above manner in later years to celebrate Id festival" (Afif, Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi, 119-20, 180, 265).

* According to Hedayah every slave girl could be used as concubine. Obtaining wives and concubines through all kinds of criminal means - capture, purchase, enslavement-was in vogue among Muslims.

* Fatawa -i- Alamgiri declares "If the breasts are large or vagina wide or baggy (which does not give requisite pleasure) whether in a virgin or a non-virgin, the purchaser has a right to return her to the seller and claim refund of money." ... (Fatawa -i-Alamgiri/ Deoband/ xxiv/ 5-6, 26-27).

* ZiyauUddin Barani reckons regulations regarding sale of "horses, slaves and quadrupeds" under one category ... (Barani, 312). Very similar rules apply both to the sale of animals and Hindu bonds men. " A milch buffalo caused 10 -12 tankahs, a working girl was cheaper. The price of a good quality horse was 90 - 120 tankahs that of a ghulam was 100 on an average. A handsome young boy could be obtained for 20 to 30 tankahs." ... (Barani, Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi, 314 - 15). It is therefore a matter of some satisfaction that under the Khaljis the value of Hindus in terms of price was not less than that of horses and buffaloes.

* Hindu boys and men in thousands were emasculated in to Hijiras (eunuchs) to serve the Muslim cities as servants and guards in the harems. Most of the Hijiras (eunuchs) comprised of Hindu slaves captured during wars and then castrated i.e. their sexual organs were removed. "During Aurangzeb's time, in the city of Hyderabad, in the year 1659 alone, 22,000 individuals were emasculated and converted into hijiras"... (Michel Erlich, Les Mutilation Sexuelles, Paris, 1991, p.59)

* The custom of taking favorite homosexual hijira slaves in Palkies (palanquins) seems to have been common so that Sultan Sikander Lodi. (1489-1517) could boast that " If I Order one of my slaves to be seated in a palki, the entire body of nobility would carry him on their shoulders at my bidding"... (Tahrikh-i-Daudi). This statement incidentally conveys an idea of the importance of handsome favorite hijira slaves and also reflects on the status of nobles under autocratic Muslim rulers. Alauddin had a corps of 50,000 personal slaves, Mohammed Tughlaq 20,000 and Firoz Tughlaq 40,000. (Tarikh -i- Firoz Shahi, Shams Siraj Afif, 270, 272)

* According to Ibn Khaldun, the captives after war were "brought from the House of War to the House of Islam under the rule of slavery, which hides in itself a divine providence; cured by slavery, they enter the Muslim religion with the firm resolve of true believers..." (Ibn Khaldun; Ibar, trs./ Bernard Lewis in Islam/ 98). Muslims took pride in enslaving people; the feelings of Hindu victims were just opposite. In the flowery language of Edward Gibbon, " By the repetition of a sentence (kalima) and loss of a foreskin, subjects or the slave, the captive or the criminal, arose in a moment the free or equal companion of victorious Muslims. "(Gibbon 2, 782 and 720).

* How did the Hindu women react to such a desperate situation? When Sindh lay prostrate before the armies of Mohammed bin Qasim, "Raja Dahir's sister Bai collected all the women in the fort of Rawar and addressed them thus: 'it is certain that we cannot escape the clutches of these Chandals and cow-eaters... As there is no hope of safety and liberty, let us collect firewood and cotton and oil and burn ourselves to ashes'. All of them were of one mind, and so they entered a house and set fire to it, and soon burnt to ashes... (Chachnama, Kalichbeg, 153-55, E.D., I /181).

* Thereafter, throughout the medieval period, as soon as it was certain that there had been a defeat and the men had been killed, women perished in the 'fire of Jauhar', Jiva-har, i.e. taking of life.

* The Jauhar at Chittor during Akbar's invasion may be mentioned as an instance in the Mughal period. On the night of 23 February 1568, after Rajput commander Jai mal's death people of Chittor resolved to perform the rite of Jauhar. Flames broke out at various places in the palace, as many as three hundred Hindu women were burnt in the fire of Jauhar...(Akbar Nama, II, 472)

* During Jujhar Singh Bundela's resistance in the Orcha in the time of Shahjahan, many women were captured by the Muslim army and treated most cruelly. It was in this fashion that Hindu women used to be captured and distributed for the service in the harems of the Muslim elite...(Cambridge History of India, IV, p.195)

* "A left-over from this period is the North-Indian custom of celebrating weddings at midnight: this was a safety measure against the Islamic sport of bride catching" (K. Elst/ Negationism in India/ Voice of India/ New Delhi/ p.28)

* "Here we should remember the Devshirme system (Greek for 'collecting boys'). Initiated by the Ottoman Sultan Orkhan (1326-1359), it existed for about 300 years. It consisted of a regular levy of non-Muslim children from the enslaved population of the Balkans. These Christian, Jew and Gypsy turned Muslim children of about the age of seven, were trained to fight against their own erstwhile brethren. This system of forced levy of children formed for centuries the mainstay of the despotic power of Islam in Balkans and was kept alive by a regular contribution exacted on enslaved innocent populations annually in contingents of a thousand children. The Mohammedan legal expert attempted to apologize for this inhuman tax, collected in the form of live human beings, by representing these collected non-Muslim children as the one-fifth of the loot which the Holy Koran legally assign to the Muslim ruler as his lawful share".

"A sort of Devshirme system still exist today in the Islamic Sudan and has been described and denounced by the United Nations Special Rapporteur Mr. Gaspar Biro in his 1994 report, and by an article in the Times of London-"Sudanese Christian sold as slaves", August 25,1995". (Bat Ye'or / The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam, 7th to 20th century: from Jihad to Dhimmitude/ Associated University Presses/ 1996).

According to Francois Gautier - "This is the profession of faith of a Muslim 'I certify that there is no other God than Allah, of whom Mohammed is the only prophet' which means in effect: 'After and before Mohammed, there is nobody else'.... "Thus the whole religion of Islam is based on negation: nobody but us, no other religion but ours. And if you disagree, you shall die. This puts a serious limitation to tolerance and from this strong belief sprang all the horrors of the Muslim invasion of India"... (Arise Again, O' India!).

"The Bahamani Sultans in central India, made it a rule to kill 100,000 Hindus a year. In 1399, Teimur killed 100,000 Hindus in a single day. The Hindu population decreased by 80 million between the year 1000 and 1525 A.D. indeed the biggest holocaust in the whole world history"... (ibid.) "Entire cities were burnt down and their populations massacred. Every new invader made, often literally, his hill of Hindu skulls. Thus the conquest of Afghanistan in year 1000, was followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there, indeed, the region is still called 'Hindu Kush', meaning Hindu Slaughter"... (ibid). Hindu-Kush range is literally the mountain of evidence of Islamic crimes against humanity. Muslims can still have a clean conscience and praise Islam, wonder!!!.

Francois Gautier writes, "The happiest in this matter must be the Muslims themselves. What fools these Hindus are, they must be telling themselves, we killed them by the millions, we wrested the whole nation out of them, we engineered riots against them and they still defend us!..." (ibid).

"NEGATIONISM means that this whole aspect of Indian history has been totally erased, not only from the history books, but also from the memory, from the consciousness of Indian people. Whereas the Jews have constantly tried, since Nazi genocide, to keep alive the remembrance of their six million martyrs, the Indian leadership political and intellectual (that is professional pseudo-secularists) has made a willful and conscious attempt to deny the genocide perpetrated by the Muslims. No one is crying for vengeance. It is only a matter of making sure that history does not repeat its mistakes, as alas it is able to do today. Witness the persecution of Hindus in Kashmir, whose 250,000 people have fled their 5,000 year old homeland; or the 50,000 Hindus chased from Afghanistan; or the oppression of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan. And most of all, to remember, is to be able to look at today with the wisdom of yesterday. No collective memory should be erased for appeasing a particular community... (Ibid.)

On Dhimmis- The Second Class Citizens of Islamic States

The Hadis and the four "pious" Khalifas elaborated the principles which are to be applied in jihad against those who do not accept Islam nor agree to pay jizyah tax. The non-muslim males capable of bearing arms are to be massacred; the non-muslim women and children are to be enslaved; the movable properties of the non-muslims are to be looted; their lands are to be confiscated; their temples are to be destroyed; their priests and monks are to be killed and their libraries, literature and scriptures burnt.

Those who agree to pay jizyah tax are to be treated as Dhimmis who are allowed to live and work for the Islamic state under the following 20 disabilities:

1. Non-Muslims are not to build any new temples.

2. Non-Muslims are not to repair any old temples which have been destroyed by the Muslims.

3. Non-Muslims are not to prevent Muslim travellers from staying in their temples.

4. Non-Muslims are to entertain for three days any Muslim who wants to stay in their homes, and for a longer period if the Muslim falls ill.

5. Non-Muslims are not to harbour any hostility towards the Islamic state, or give any aid and comfort to hostile elements.

6. Non-Muslims are not to prevent any one of them from getting converted to Islam.

7. Non-Muslims have to show respect towards every Muslim.

8. Non-Muslims have to allow Muslims to participate in their private meetings.

9. Non-Muslims are not to dress like Muslims.

10. Non-Muslims are not to name themselves with Muslim names.

11. Non-Muslims are not to ride on horses with saddle and bridle.

12. Non-Muslims are not to possess arms.

13. Non-Muslims are not to wear signet rings or seals on their fingers.

14. Non-Muslims are not to sell or drink liquor openly.

15. Non-Muslims are to wear a distinctive dress which shows their inferior status, and which separates them from the Muslims.

16. Non-Muslims are not to propagate their customs and usages amongst the Muslims.

17. Non-Muslims are not to build their houses in the neighbourhood of Muslims.

18. Non-Muslims are not to bring their dead near the graveyards of the Muslims.

19. Non-Muslims are not to observe their religious practices publicly, or mourn their dead loudly.

20. Non-Muslims are not to buy Muslim slaves.

When an Islamic state was established over parts of northern India, the Ulama raised a great controversy. By now the interpreters of Islamic law had become divided into four schools - Hanafi, Hanbali, Maliki, and Shafii. The Hanafi school of Islamic law alone was in favour of extending the status of dhimmis to the Hindus. The other three schools were insistent that the only choice the Hindus had was between Islam and death. Ziyauddin Barani voiced his opinion against the Hanafi school of law when he wrote as follows in his Fatwa-i-Jahandari: "If Mahmud...had gone to India once more, he would have brought under his sword all the Brahmans of Hind who, in that vast land, are the cause of the continuance of the laws of infidelity and of the strength of idolators; he would have cut off the heads of two or three hundred thousand Hindu chiefs. He would not have returned his slaughtering sword to its scabbard until the whole of Hind had accepted Islam. For Mahmud was a Shafiite, and according to Imam Shafii the decree for Hindus is Islam or death, that is to say, they should either be put to death or accept Islam. It is not lawful to accept jiziya from Hindus who have neither a prophet nor a revealed book." (The Story of Imperialism in India/ Sita Ram Goel / p. 90 - 92)

The Jizyah Tax on Hindus has played an enormous role in the spread of Islam in India. The so-called Sufi-saint Amir Khusrau laments that had Hanafite law, not prevailed in India, which allows Kafirs the concession of survival on payment of Jizyah tax, the Hindus would have vanished root and branch:

Ba-dhimmah gar na budi rukhsat-I shar,

Na mandi nam-I Hindu zi sl ta far.

Literally translated from Persian, -"Did the Dhimmis (the second class Hindu citizen under Muslim rule) not enjoy the concession of shariya, all trace of the Hindu would vanish root and branch. (Amir Khusrau/Ashiqah/Ed. By Rashid Ahmad Ansari/ Alligarh/ 1917/ p.46)

The "law" of Islam also prescribes death penalty for those who:

1. Question the exclusive claim of Islam as the only true religion, and of Mohammed as the last prophet. Thus Islam has closed its gates to logical and open debate, becoming a closed system for all times to come.

2. Try to revert to their ancestral faith after having been forced or lured to embrace Islam. Islam keeps firm grip on its people by making apostasy a capital offence, as is also blasphemy towards God and the prophet. Thus Muslims are hostages held as captives by the Islam, through brain washing, fear of hell, threats, use of force, and of course through promise of ultimate reward which Islam offers: Paradise, the place for unlimited sexual orgies, forever... (Koran - 2:25; 4:13; 9:111; 10:91; 47:15; 52:17 - 24)

3. Marry Muslim women without first getting converted to Islam. Mani Ratnam's film 'Bombay' (Hero - Hindu, Heroin - Manisha Koirala potraying a Muslim girl) is an example. A country made hand grenade was thrown at Mani Ratnam in Madras -the message sent by this act was that you will have to pay with your life if you violate the provisions of Sharia even in fiction and films, leave alone the real life.

Non Muslims are also discriminated against, in matters of testimony in law courts, taxation, and appointment to public offices. To sum up, the status of non-Muslims (dhimmis) in an Islamic state is that of hewers of wood and drawers of water. They are subjected to every possible indignity and pressure in order to force them into the fold of Islam.

Indian Muslims are descendants of these victims of Islamic imperialism. They are culturally and anthropologically very much Indians. Due to the imposed alien Arab ideology of Islam, their loyalties lie with the pan-Islamic issues, as they do not know the cruel history of the forced conversion of their ancestors. This unfortunate situation has induced an 'identity crisis' among them and turned them into a culturally rootless and hostile mass.

On Islamic Theology - The root of intolerance

It is necessary to make the distinction between Muslims and Islam. The two are not identical. In fact Muslims are the victims of the Islamic ideology. Therefore it is important to trace the Muslim behaviour pattern back to the Islamic belief system. Three Islamic thought-categories form the very foundation of Islamic theology and its belief system and it is these thought-categories which are primarily responsible for the intolerant and violent behaviour of the Muslims.

1. Islamic theology divides human family into two incompatible and hostile factions. There are Muslim believers on the one hand who are Allah's favourites to whom he has promised victory in this world and paradise hereafter. On the other hand, there are The Kafirs whose lives, liberties, properties and honour has been forfeited by Allah in favour of the faithful. Muslims can have a clean conscience when they slaughter, plunder, loot and enslave the Kafirs by every means and in every way. They are only fulfilling Allah's inexorable will.

This aggressive war against Kafirs was held up by the Prophet as superior to all meritorious deeds such as prayer, fasting, pilgrimage etc. The Muslim who kills 'Kafirs' in Jihad is honored as 'Ghazi' and enjoys a higher status in Muslim society i.e. 'Ummah'. The Muslim who gets killed in a jihad becomes a 'Shahid' (martyr) and goes straight to Koranic paradise without having to wait for the Day of the Judgment like the rest of the Muslims. And in the paradise he gets seventy virgins and a number of young handsome boys for his enjoyment. Therefore, Jiahd is salvation through murder and suicide. Hence, we find suicide squads and Islamic belly-bombers around the world killing innocent children and women.

The captured Kafir women, snatched from their husbands, can be enjoyed with absolute impunity by the Muslims, in fact such acts are made lawful by Allah himself (Koran 4:24).

The captured Kafir children are the property of their master, who could dispose of them, as he like, selling them, gifting them away, hiring them out, lending them and mortgaging them. The master has the right to live in concubinage with his female slaves. The Koran {4:3, 4:24, 4:25,23:6) has permitted this practice. The Prophet himself possessed at least fifty-nine slaves at one stage or another both male and female. Mirkhond, the Prophet's fifteenth-century biographer, names them all in his "Rauzat-us-Safa".

Islam knows no co-operation on the basis of equality or co-existence with the kafirs to whom it offers at most four alternatives: 1. Conversion to Islam 2. Death by sword 3. Slavery 4. Pay exploitative religious tax Jaziah, and to become Dhimmi, that is, to accept the status of second class citizen.

2. Islamic theology divides the inhabited world into two irreconcilable camps. On the one hand, there is the Dar-ul-Islam, the land held by Muslims where the Shariat rules. This is the base from which Muslims operate. On the other hand, there is Dar-ul-Harb, the lands in which kafirs live and which the Muslims should subject to non-stop war. The Muslims should spare neither their persons nor their properties in the effort to convert every Dar-ul-Harb to Dar-ul-Islam. Thus Islam postulates 'Jihad bil Saif' (striving by the sword) the permanent war between these divisions, till all the kafirs are either converted or killed and their women, wealth and lands taken away.

The Prophet Mohammed claimed that one of the six points of his superiority over earlier prophets was that while loot was not lawful for them, Allah had made it so for him "Eat you the spoils of war, it is lawful and pure" (Koran 8:69). He also laid down the rule according to which one-fifth of the loot belonged to Allah and his Prophet (Koran 8:41), while the remaining four-fifths was to be divided among those who took part in the raid which brought the loot. This "sacred one-fifth" came to be known as the 'Khams' which became in the later times one of the four main sources of revenue for the Islamic state.

According to the Hadis collections the main Jihad bil Saif, that is, Jihad by sword is to be supported by three other forms of Jihad, they are -

a. Jihad bil nafs- that is, cursing the Kafirs silently or in private if conditions do not permit them publicly by means of speech and writing, etc.

b. Jihad bil lasan- that is, preaching against Kafirs publicly, passing pejorative labels on them and threatening them with the defeat and disgrace which await them in this world, and the doom hereafter. This is exactly the type of Jihad conducted by Islamic Madarsas (Islamic schools for teaching theology) throughout India and State Governments provide them financial aid in the name of secularism. This is one more example of how Hindu tax payer's money is used against him by the Pseudo-secular State.

c. Jihad bil Qalam- that is writing down on paper and other materials what Faithful Muslim has harbored in his heart against Kafirs. The written material is used for preservation of the Polemics as well as for its wider circulation. This type of Jihad is conducted by Urdu-Press, and Governments extend all facilities to them to uphold the principle of freedom of press.

     Wooing Hindu girls, but at the same time compelling their own sisters to wear burqua and to stay away from the Hindu boys, practising polygamy, rejecting population control measures and encouraging cross-border infiltration from Bangladesh and Pakistan in order to reduce the majority of kafirs into a minority of Dhimmis by the end of 21st century, are the demographic dimensions of jihad.

     To launder the Muslim-mafia money and present the Sufi-mask of Islam to befool kafirs is the cinematographic front of Jihad. The use of Internet to confuse the Kafirs, and to produce, push and percolate counterfeit-currency to undermine their economy are the modern dimensions of Jihad. Weapon smuggling and drug trafficking are other unholy sides of the holy war.

     Some of the insidious dimensions of Jihad are; to use freedoms granted by open democratic society of the Kafirs in such a manner that those very freedoms can be ultimately destroyed and the dictatorship of Islam can be imposed over the Kafirs, to plant Trojan horses in democratic institutions of the kafirs for subverting them and, to buy-out writers and journalists by petro-dollars and to place them strategically inside the print and electronic media so that Kafirs can be brainwashed and duped into believing that "Islam is a Noble faith".

3. Islamic theology bifurcates human history into two sharply defined periods. The period before the proclamation of Mohammed's prophet-hood is the age of ignorance "Jahiliya" and the period that follows it is the age of illumination "Ilm".

Every thing that prevailed in the age of ignorance is to be destroyed outright or to be converted in such a manner that it looks as if it came into existence after the dawn of the Age of Islamic Illumination. The norms of ignorance and illumination are determined not by any objective or comparative criteria, but by the dictums of Koran and Hadith.

For example, Mullah Omar ordered the destruction of all the statues in Afghanistan. Accordingly, Buddhist relics, a legacy of the pre-Islamic time, were systematically pulverised. It was announced that two massive Buddhas standing over a hundred feet high, dated from the third and fifth centuries, at Bamiyan would be destroyed. In March 2001 job was finished once and for all with artillery and explosives.

After the incident, Muslims slaughtered hundred cows to atone for delays in destroying country's ancient Buddha statues. Some twenty butchers inside the presidential palace were seen chopping the cows into one kilogram pieces for general distribution among Muslims... (Hindustan Times / New Delhi / dated 20.03.2001)

Why were ancient Buddha statues destroyed by the Islamic Government of Afghanistan? Because Buddha represents "Jahiliya" that is pre-Islamic ignorance while Mohammed represents "Ilm" that is Islamic illumination. Therefore the pre-Islamic past of the nation has to be obliterated.

Islam uproots the converted people from their native soil, culture, civilisation and history and imposes over them an unreal identity. This imposed and artificial Arab identity generates tremendous unease and social upheaval for generations. In the words of Bangladeshi authoress Taslima Nasreen "The problem is not Islamic fundamentalism but Islam itself." But more precisely these three dialectic Islamic thought-categories are the root of the problem.

Secularism and Islam are mutually exclusive. The Islam can set-up only a theocratic state. The Islam has institutionalised slavery and degraded women and has laid waste many countries. Islam lacks any doctrine of co-existence. In Islam all human beings are not treated as equals. Islam has two sets of principles of morality, ethics and justice, one is for Muslims and the other for non-Muslims. For example, on one hand, they want to build mosque over the Ramjanmbhoomi at Ayodhya, the sacred city of Hindus while on the other, no non-Muslim can ever enter the city of Mecca where Kaba is situated and if found in the vicinity he will be beheaded as per the tradition of Islam. (Koran 9:5,28,29).

Here it is pertinent to note that the mosque of Kaba was previously a Pagan temple and was occupied by force then desecrated, destroyed and converted into a mosque by Prophet Mohammed himself, thus setting an example, and making destruction of Hindu-temples, churches, synagogues, and Buddhist-vihars a lawful and pious activity for Muslims throughout the world and for all ages to come.

The prophet is traditioned to have willed that no Kafir should be permitted to reside in Arabia. Mohammed initiated the violent campaign of ethnic cleansing of Arabia by converting, kidnapping, expelling and killing the Arabian Pagans, Jews and Christians and their land, wealth and women were taken away. Find out, how prophet acquired so many wives? Therefore, today the Arabian sands lay ethnically cleansed of all non-Muslim impurities. Times have changed. Now Islam claims innocence, that 'Islam is a peaceful religion'. Wonder! That is the ultimate performance in the art of hypocrisy.

Thus, like all totalitarian ideologies Islam survives and thrives on moral asymmetry, intellectual dishonesty, political hypocrisy, double standards of behaviour and use of terror against the spirit of free inquiry.

In short Islam divides SPACE, TIME and MANKIND into two incompatible and hostile parts that is why fundamentalism and terrorism is not accidental but essential to Islam. In Islam, truth is established by sword. These thought-categories make Islam a totalitarian and terrorist cult that it has remained ever since its birth. Thus Islam has invented eternally cruel 'One God' and perpetually hostile 'Two Humanities'. In modern rational world One God but Two Humanities is an unacceptable preposition.

Truth from The Horse's Mouth

Brigadier S.K. Malik of Pakistan wrote a book named "The Quranic Concept of War " in 1979. He collected and analysed the Koranic verses on war against kafirs. They add up to 267 and are spread over 17 surahs (chapters) of Koran. The book carries a foreword by the late General Zia-ul-Haq who promoted the concept of "proxy " war against India. The General says: " This book brings out Koranic philosophy on the application of military force within the context of the totality, that is Jehad. Which is not the exclusive domain of the professional solider, nor is it restricted to the application of military force alone. The professional solider in a Muslim army, pursuing the goals of a Muslim state, cannot become 'professional' if in all his activities he does not take the 'colour of Allah'.

Allah Bukhsh K. Brohi who was the former Pakistan's ambassador in India has written a preface for Malik's book. He makes following points -" Islam views the world as though it were bipolarised in two opposite camps: Dar-ul-Islam facing Dar-ul-Harb the first one is submissive to Allah's purpose... but the second one is engaged in perpetuating defiance of Allah... The idea of Islam is incapable of being realised within the framework of territorial states...Islam supplies the spiritual principle of integration of mankind... a principle which is supra-national, supra-racial, supra-linguistic and supra-territorial... in Islam, of course, no nation is sovereign since Allah alone is the only sovereign in whom all authority vests".

Brigadier S.K. Malik starts with - "The Holy Quran gives us a philosophy of war. The divine philosophy is an integral part of the Quranic ideology". In chapter three titled 'The Causes of War' he writes - "The central theme behind the causes of war as spelt out by the Holy Quran, was the causes of Allah (Koran 2:190,244; 4:84) it was essentially a war fought by Faithful Muslims against unbeliever Kafirs {Koran 4.76)".

In chapter seven of the book ' the strategy of war' Brigadier S.K. Malik says -"Instructions pertaining to the divine theory of military strategy are found in the Quranic revelations (Koran 3:124-26; 8:9-10,11,59-60). All these revelations urge the Faithful Muslim to prepare for war to the utmost in order to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies"... (Pg. 58)

Malik elaborates as follows - "Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means it is the end in itself ... it is the point where the means and the end meet and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy. It is the decision we wish to impose upon him..." (Pg. 60)

"Terror... can be instilled only if the opponent's Faith (read religion) is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary; spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the spiritual dislocation. To instil terror into the hearts of the enemy, it is essential, in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith..." (Pg. 60)

Does it sound diabolical? Not to Muslim, Communist and pseudo-secular ears for sure. Terrorism in all its forms has been the most effective weapon in the armoury of Islam ever since its advent. Great terrorists have been the heroes whom Muslims cherish the most. And it is terror, which has seen to it that victims do not remember what they were subjected to before they were forced into the fold of the Islam. The victims thus converted and brainwashed are expected and exhorted to become- and do become in most cases- terrorist in their own turn! (Goel SR/The Calcutta Quran Petition / Voice of India, New Delhi). Malik writes, in chapter nine, "The Application of Quranic Military Thought", about the career of Prophet Muhammed as a warlord from 622 AD to 632 AD. Malik and Muslim scholars of his ilk want us to believe that the Muslim armies succeeded in these campaigns because they practiced the strategies of war reposited in the Quran. This is a Big Lie. They succeeded because the Pagan Arabs lived in a series of tribal settlements and did not understand Muhammad's game, while Muslims at Medina built up a formidable war machine with the help of plunder obtained in raids, and by recruiting desperadoes from all over Arabia through lure of loot & free sex and bloodlust. Later on, the militarized Arabs succeeded in overrunning the Persian and Roman empires because the two empires had exhausted themselves through mutual warfare for a thousand years, (ibid).

"The Koran wants Muslim to retain the initiative to themselves through bold, aggressive but calculated and deliberate planning and conduct of war. The Muslim are to be harangued constantly and roused to commit aggression again and again, Koran-9:5; 8:65". "Machiavelli who had studied the history of prophets has observed in his magnum opus, 'The Prince' that "all well-armed prophets have conquered and the unarmed failed" (ibid).

"In fact, prophets other than Muhammad had arisen in Arabia itself, before, alongside and after Muhammad. But all of them had failed because they did not raise armies and assemble arsenals. Muhammad succeeded because he equipped his mission with a mailed fist. It may be noted that while he had only 301 ill-equipped warriors with him in the Battle of Badr (622 AD), he had 10,000 well-equipped men when he marched into Mecca eight years later (630 AD) and 30,000 when he planned an invasion of Palestine on the eve of his death (632 AD)." (ibid).

"The term 'jihad' may have acquired a mystic meaning for Muslims who believe in Muhammad's "revelations", and the divinity of Allah. But for the historian who studies recorded facts and uses normal human reason to reach conclusions, " jihad" is no more than physical aggression preceded by ideological aggression." (ibid). "

A determined minority always succeeds if the victims of aggression do not understand the game, even if the latter are larger in number and more prosperous. That is how the Christians succeeded in Roman Empire, the Muslims in Arabia, the communists in Russia and China, the Nazis in Germany and the Fascist in Italy. It is as simple as that" (ibid).

On Pseudo-Secular media - The secular- slaves of Islamic Terror

The Present day Indian leadership and the pseudo-secular media cherishes the found belief that they can manage the Muslims in India and elsewhere by praising Islam, its Prophet, and its scripture. This is exactly the attitude of second class non-Muslim citizens of Islamic states, who by paying Jaziah tax and by praising Islam save their necks. And this mental attitude of slavery is known as 'Dhimmitude'. These pseudo secular Dhimmies conveniently forget that this is exactly what Gandhi had done, and that this precisely is the reason why he failed. Dhimmitude will never pay, therefore, always call a spade a spade.

The pseudo-secular media has perverted India's political parlance by inventing a fraudulent Dhimmi terminology to describe the current situation prevailing in the country. This deceitful jargon is their main tool to deceive Hindus. It is important to expose their Orwellian double speak. You can make these verbal weapons useless by using the alternative and truthful terminology in place of media-sponsored misleading jargon.

For example, use the following expressions:

* "Muslim terrorist" in place of "Kashmiri Militant";

* "Well guided by Koran and employed in the service of Allah" in place of "misguided and unemployed youth";

* "Islam" in place of "Islamic fundamentalism" (Islam is fundamentalism);

* "Islamic Terrorism" in place of "Pakistani Terrorism";

* "Hindu victims of ethnic cleansing" in place of * "Kashmiri migrants";

* "Opportunistic Islam" in place of "Moderate Islam";

* "Mask-of-Islam" in place of "Sufi-Islam";

* "Terrorist-rights" in place of "Human-rights";

* "Islamic Dark Age" in place of "Medieval Muslim Rule";

* "Bastard - Harem culture" in place of "composite culture";

* "Dhimmitude" or "Dharma Adharma Sambhava" in place of "Sarva Dharma Sambhava" and "Dhimmi" in place of "Secular";

* "Pseudo-secularism" in place of "secularism";

* "Agents of Islam" in place of "Leftists and communists";

* "Nationalism" in place of "Hindu communalism";

* "Nationalist" in place of "Hindu Rightist, Reactionary and Revivalist";

* "Nationalisation" in place of "Saffronization";

* "Denationalisation" in place of "Secularisation";

The use of correct terminology is sure antidote to the pseudo-secular Dhimmitude and Muslim self-righteousness. Raise objection whenever and wherever the right expression is not used.

Another mean trick of the pseudo-secular Dhimmies is to blame Pakistan but insulate and absolve the Islam from any charges of terrorist crimes. Pakistan has not invented Islamic terrorism, they are only religiously practising it and even Pakistani people themselves are victims of it. It was invented and perfected by the Prophet of Islam himself. Islam is the political ideology of predator Arab imperialism thinly camouflaged in the garb of religion and implemented by terror and Pakistan is its geographical manifestation. We should never forget that Pakistan is created by the Islam, for the Islam and it is the nation of the Islam. Therefore, the idea that "Pakistan is bad but Islam is good" is a media sponsored fraud. Do not fall into this media manufactured mental trap. On the contrary, if Pakistan is bad, then Islam is essentially bad, because it is the ideological backbone of that state.

By simply blaming Musharaff, ISI or Pakistan for Islamic crimes committed on Indian territory, we can not solve this problem. We can better serve our nation by reading Koran (the fountainhead of all Islamic terrorist activities) and by educating our people about its violent contents. So that ordinary Indian citizens can effectively counter the falsehood propagated by pseudo-secular media that 'Islam is a religion of peace', and thus save Hindu society from falling into Dhimmitude.

Pakistan's objective is to complete the mission of Islam in India, which lay unfinished in spite of millennium long 'Jihad'. It is foolish to think that the problem will vanish if Kashmir is handed over to them. Pakistan's motive is to convert Dar-ul-Harb into Dar-ul-Islam, bit by bit, first Kashmir, then Assam, then Kerala and so on. Only this Islamic mission provides the ideological justification for the existence of Pakistan.

A Questionnaire

By finding answers to the following questions the pseudo-secularists can help their Muslim brothers:

1. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'democracy'?

2. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'secularism'?

3. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'universal human rights'?

4. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'minority rights'?

5. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'women rights'?

6. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'freedom of inquiry' and 'freedom of expression'?

7. Is Islamic theology compatible with the concept of 'nationalism'?

8. Is Islamic theology compatible with the 'fine and liberal arts' such as painting, sculpture, dance, drama, film, and music?

9. Is Islamic theology compatible with the 'modern economy'?

10. Is Islamic theology compatible with the 'logic, rationality and science'?

If yes, how? If not, why?

Why totalitarian ideologies Nazism and Fascism are

bad, but Islam is good?

Whenever and wherever you meet a pseudo-secular Dhimmi confront him with this questionnaire along with a copy of Koran and expose his intellectual dishonesty.

We repeat that Islam and secularism are mutually exclusive. Therefore no one can claim that he is a secular person and a Muslim too. Philosophically this is absurd, because of inherent dialectics of the Koran. One can either be a Muslim or a secular person, but can never become both, that is impossible. This is the great dilemma of Indian Muslims after the partition of India. The Indian Muslims can come out of this trap by free, fair and frank discussions on the nature of Islam, but never through Gandhian falsehood, appeasement and Dhimmitude. It is only and only the truth about the nature of Islam that can save both Muslims and Hindus but not violence and the counter violence.

It is pseudo-secularists, who have suppressed facts about the history of Islamic crimes, perverted and blocked the discussion on the true nature of Islam, and thereby immensely harmed the Indian society. In fact they have conspired to create a mental atmosphere of Dhimmitude, which allows you to praise Islam, its Prophet and its scriptures but never allows you to examine Islam critically. Therefore the first step to foster permanent peace is to expose pseudo-secular Dhimmies who dodge, distort and divert the free, fair and frank discussion on the nature of Islam.

For example Jawaharlal Nehru, the Don of pseudo-secularism wrote about Mongols : "...Even their ferocity and cruelty, shocking as it was, has a childish element in them—it is this childish element in them, I think, that makes these warriors rather attractive..." (Glimpses of World History. Pg. 350) So Nehru found the childish cruelty of the Mongols rather attractive ! Next, he writes : "...Babur was one of the most cultured and delightful persons one could meet. There was no sectarianism in him, no religious bigotry, and he did not destroy as his ancestors used to" (ibid. Pg. 476.) Once again we see whitewashing in action. Further Nehru wrote : "...Mahmud Gaznavi was not a religious man. He was a Mohammedan, ofcourse, but that was by the way..." This statement is demonstrably false. (Rajaram, NS/Profiles in Deception / Pg. 177-178).

Nehru saw as his mission 'modernization' of India by combining Westernization and Marxism, accompanied by the gradual elimination of the Hindu influence which he regarded as a brake on modernization. This last part—de-hinduisation of public life was called 'secularism'; and this Nehruvian version of secularism includes accommodation of Islamic Personal Law, divorce of Muslim women without due course and other medieval practices, but is opposed to the introduction of a uniform civil code—one that disregards religion for the whole country. According to Nehru : it is 'secular' for the Muslims to be governed by Islamic law courts, subject to religious law, but 'communal' for anyone to demand a uniform legal code that is not based on religion. (ibid./Pg. 173-174).

To conclude we would like to say few last words. The process of suppressing facts and spreading falsehood about nature of Islam and its imperialism, encouraged by pseudo-secular Jawahar Lal Nehru through his book 'Discovery of India', does not develop at once. It is a long process that involves many elements of Islamic Imperialism like slavery, fear of physical harm and specific mental conditioning known as 'Dhimmitude', i.e., mental slavery of Islamic terror by vanquished people. It happens when peoples replace history by myths, when they fight to uphold these destructive myths about Islam more than their own values and Dharma because they are confused by having transformed lies into truth. The psedo-secularist hold to these "Islam is a religion of peace" type myths as if they were the only guarantee for their survival, on the contrary they are the path of destruction. Terrorized by evidence and teachings of the history of Islamic crimes, these people prefer to destroy it rather than to face it. They invent moral justification for their own self-destruction. Force, fraud and fear must go out of our democractic way of life.

Opinions of some scholars on Islam

(1) Sir V.S. Naipul - "Islam is in its origins an Arab religion. Everyone not an Arab, who is a Muslim, is a convert, Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert's worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands; his sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own; he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his. The disturbance for societies is immense, and even after a thousand years can remain unresolved; the turning away has to be done again and again. People develop fantasies about who and what they are; and in the Islam of converted countries there is an element of neurosis and nihilism. These countries can be easily set on the boil.".... (Beyond Belief / Viking, Penguin India / New Delhi)

(2) Shabbir Akhtar - "Islam is practiced with ritual precision and perfect reverence for its Arabian dimension. The Koran is not theologically Arabian, but it is ritually and behaviouristically Arabian through and through. Koran promotes Arab interests, sanctifies Arab culture and language, promotes Arab-centered Islamic brotherhood and vigorously encourages the defense of Arab political rights in the Holy Land. With these privileges granted by God and never questioned by non-Arab Muslims, one can see why Arabs see themselves as patrons rather than mere adherents of Islam. If we allow for Semitic hyperbole in the Koran, Islam may have been meant solely for Arabs: its status as universal religion may be due to a misunderstanding of Arabic idiom"... (The times Higher Education Supplement / 22/8/1997)

(3) Anwar Shaikh - "The Prophet Mohammed divided humanity into two sections-The Arabs and Non-Arabs. The Arabs are the rulers and Non-Arabs are to be ruled. Islam is the means to realize this dream. Islam has caused more damage to national dignity and honor of Non-Arab Muslims than any other calamity. Yet they believe that this faith is the ambassador of : 1. Equality, and 2. Human love. This is fiction.".... (Islam, the Arab national movement / London /1995).

Allah thinks of unbelievers as "the worst animals" 1 and thus declares Himself to be "the enemy of infidels" 2. So odious is His detestation of those, who do not believe in Him, that He orders their murder and pillage on a permanent basis. To complete this most horrendous plan, He offers for these misdeeds rewards of paradise, the most luxurious place for the choicest carnal pleasures. Thus, sex and violence rank as the two pillars of the Islamic faith. Readers ought to bear in mind that the basic belief of Islam is that Allah is One and He is "the Creator, Almighty and All-knowing". If this were true, He would have created everybody a Muslim. Since this is not the case because people are born as Hindus, Christians, Jews atheists, etc., converting them through violence and sexual bribe, cannot be the Divine approach. Still worse, a person who believes in God alone, does not rank as a Muslim, and deserves the punishment of hell -fire. To qualify for paradise, one must believe in Muhammad as well. Obviously, Muhammad is as great as Allah.

Murdering and robbing innocent people is the greatest evil that can be. What is even more baffling is the fact that Allah calls such atrocities as Jehad (the holy war), declares pillage as "lawful and good" and offers paradise as a reward for such abominations..........No God shall resort to sex and violence for securing followers. This is blasphemous for being injurious to the concept of Divinity. It is simply a Mohammedan plan for building an Arab Empire.

The Islamic philosophy seeks to establish a world-order founded on permanent annihilation of the human species, unless, like Allah and His angels, it adores Muhammad day and night. One can see clearly that the dream of paradise i.e., sex-after-death, is morally below the dignity of man because it involves him into a pattern of violence, which is the distinction of lower animals. [Anwar Shaikh/ Islam Sex and Violence/ISBN 0-9536683-0-4/The Principality Publishers/UK}.

(4) Ibn Warraq -"Islam is a form of Totalitarianism,...the effects of the teachings of the Koran have been a disaster for human reason and social, intellectual and moral progress.".... "Bowing towards Arabia five times a day must surely be the ultimate symbol of cultural imperialism"... (Ibn Warraq / Why I am not a Muslim/ Prometheus Books/New York)

(5) Ernest Renam - "Muslims are the first victims of Islam. That fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain the others in the practice of religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him".... (as quoted by Ibn Warraq in 'why I am not a Muslim')

(6) Dr. Jan Knappert - "In Medina, Mohammed organizes raids on passing caravans which, he says, are justified by God. Soon he encourages his followers to assassinate political opponents. The booty is his. Read on, it is a fascinating story of crimes: Mohammed's life."... (Review of Why I am not a Muslim)

"Muslims mutilating the genitals of girls* will claim that they have a right to do so since our countries protect religious freedom, their own countries do not. There is, however, a limit to freedom any religion can claim. Forced marriages of minors is a problem that feminists will have to turn their attention too but it is easier to confront western men who are infinitely more reasonable than Muslims, who are determined. When Islam comes women loose their freedom of movement, freedom of employment and so forth."... (ibid.) (* Here author is referring to Muslims of North Africa where this religious practice is prevalent).

"Islamic propaganda is responsible for untrue ideas about Islam, firstly, that it is a religion of peace. It is not and never was, witness the endless expensive wars fought by Muslim rulers and raiders. Even now the majority of conflicts of the world have Islam at their roots: The Afghanistan, Algeria, Azerbeijan, Bali, Bosnia, Chechnya, Cyprus, Ethiopia, Georgia, Israel, Kashmir, Kosovo, Lebanon, Nigeria, Philippines, Sudan, Sin-Kiang and The Timor. These wars are inherent in the teachings of Koran"... (Incidentally there are no 'Communal' Hindus in these countries to be blamed for rioting, terrorism, ethnic cleansing, genocide and wars. See the global pattern of Mohammedan gangsterism.)... "Muslims will not rest before they rule the state. And when they do rule there will be no more democracy. Islam is a religion of dominance. The man has absolute power over his wives and children. The men in turn are ruled by the 'Imam'. No matter how peaceful a man's character may be, if his imam incites him from the pulpit to kill non-Muslims, he will do it, believing that it is God's will and therefore justified, even praiseworthy."... (Ibid.)

"If Islam will one day be used by demagogue of Hitler's caliber, it will be a weapon far more dangerous than Nazism, since it claims a universal tenet: world conquest willed by an Arabic speaking God"... (ibid.)

(7) Ibn Al-Rawandi - "These repulsive characteristics are written in the Koran, the Hadhit and the Sharia, and are an ineradicable feature of the religion. There is no way that Islam can reform itself and remain Islam, no way it can ever be made compatible with pluralism, free speech, critical thought and democracy. Anyone convinced, that they already possess the truth have no need for such things."... (New Humanist)

"Although Muslim residents in non-Muslim countries (as in India) clamor for every kind of indulgence for their own beliefs and custom, there can be no doubt that given any kind of power they would impose their own beliefs and eliminate all difference (for example the ethnic cleansing of Hindus carried out in Kashmir by Muslims). Islam is religious Fascism, and it is only a feeble-minded political correctness that prevents it from being recognized as such."... (ibid.)

(8) Curt van den Heuvel - "Freedom of religion is a part of every civilized country. However, what do we do when one of these religions is antithetical to every thing that Democracy stands for? Islam does not recognize the right of any other religion to exist. Murder of apostates is not only condoned, but also encouraged by the Prophet. Women are treated shamefully, and accorded a status far inferior to that of Muslim men. If we are going to give Muslims the right to practice their religion free of interference, can we not expect them to accord others the same right?"... (Honest Intellectual enquiry/USA /11.8.1977)

(9) Daniel O'Hara - "But the irony that Muslims should demand freedom of speech in order to denounce freedom of speech is entirely lost on them. They agree, that they despise democracy and the freedoms it guarantees: but they are not above using those very freedoms to denounce and call for the abolition of freedom. They are as convinced as any Marxist of the eventual triumph of their creed."... (Free Thinker / Monthly / Dec.1995 / London)

(10) Peter Berger - "In an eerie echo of Hitler's Nuremberg laws, Afghanistan's Hindus were ordered to wear yellow clothing and identify their houses with a yellow sash. They were also told that they could no longer live with Muslims"... (Holy War, INC / W&N / London)

(11) Rizwan Salim - "Their minds filled with venom against the idol-worshippers of Hindustan, the Muslims destroyed a large number of ancient Hindu temples. This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim chroniclers and others of time. In the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact from the ancient times"... (The Hindustan Times / Nexv Delhi / 20 December 1997)

"Giving proof of the resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilization feel upon encountering a superior civilization of individuals with a more refined culture, Islamic invaders from Arabia and western Asia broke and burnt everything beautiful they came across the Hindustan. So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that rather than attract Hindu 'infidels' to Islam through force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples - and foolishly pretended that they had triumphed over minds and culture of the Hindus. I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorporated into the architecture of several mosques, including Jama Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the Uparkot fort of Junagadh and in Vidisha; the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in Ajmer - and the currently controversial Bhojshala mosque in Dhar"... (ibid)

"It is not just for 'political reasons' that Hindus want to build grand temples at the sites of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi, and the Mathura idgah. These are just three episodes in a one thousand year long Hindu struggle to reclaim their culture and religion from alien invaders"... (ibid)

"The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 was just one episode in millennial struggle of the Hindus to repossess their religion-centered culture and nation. Meanwhile, hundreds of ancient Hindu temples forsaken all over Hindustan await the reawakening of Hindu cultural pride to be repraised or rebuilt and restored to their original, ancient glory"... (ibid)

Beware of Evil Intentions of Islam

Look at the map of India, recently released by the so-called Mughalstan Research Institute - an outfit of the now banned organization of Islamic Students (Taliban) of India - SIMI. This fragmented map clearly illustrates the evil intentions of Islam in India. They suggest Indian Muslims to migrate to the green corridor of U.P. and Bihar and thus alter the demographic composition of these states so that eventually they can form a local majority and launch a separatist Islamic movement in independent India to dismember our sacred motherland.

After 1947 the Muslims proclaimed that: "Hans ke liya hai Pakistan, Lad ke lenge Hindustan". Now they are implementing the above slogan by :

(a) Conducting Information war: i.e. Buying out writers, journalists and film makers and placing them strategically inside the print, cinema and electronic media so that 'kafirs' can be brain-washed and duped into believing that Islam is a religion of peace.

(b) Launching Demographic war: Seducing and marrying Hindu girls and displaying them as proud jihad trophies i.e., jihad through "love"; rejecting population control measures, and encouraging infiltration in order to reduce the majority of 'Kafirs' into the minority of 'Dhimmis'.

(c) Organizing proxy war: i.e. spreading terror so that chey can bleed the Hindu society and nation through thousand cuts.

An Appeal in National Interest

The information war against Hindu society and India is going on. Our only weapon is truth. Truth must be told about Islam, which has been on warpath since the days of foreign domination over Hindu homeland. Everybody has a role to play. You can also help in this effort by:

* Buying and reading the standard translation of Koran in the language of your choice and making it available to friends, so that real nature and intention of Islam can be understood.

* Passing on this mail to other addresses and Posting photocopies of this document to those who are not accessible through e-mail.

* Saving this document in the hard disk, keeping copies on floppy and paper.

* Translating this document into the language of your choice.

* Discussing the contents of this document with as many friends as you can.

* Read the books listed in the reference and making them available to friends.

* Writing articles on this subject and floating them on the Internet.

* Getting connected with like-minded persons, getting networked and organized according to your own conscience, wisdom and free will.

* Generating creative ideas and providing them on the Internet.

References

1. Anwar Shaikh, Islam Sex and Violence, ISBN 0-9536683-0-4,The Principality Publishers, UK, 1999

2. Arun Shourie, The World of Fatwas: Or Sharia in action, ASA Publications, A-31, West End NewDelhi, 110021

3. Dr.Elst Koenraad, Decolonising Hindu mind, Rupa &Co., 7/16, Ansari Road, Daryaganj , New Delhi-110002

4. Eaton, Richard Maxwell, Sufis of Bijapur: 1300-1700, Munshi Ram Manohar Lal, Publishers Pvt. Ltd. Post Box 5715,54 Rani Jhansi Road, New Delhi, 110005

5. Elliot and Dowson, History of India as told by its own Historians, 8 vols., New Delhi reprint, 1990, (London 1867-77)

6. Goel, Sita Ram, The Calcutta Quran petition. Voice of India, 2/18, Ansari road, Daryaganj, New Delhi, 110002.

7. Lal K.S., Legacy of Muslim rule in India, Aditya Prakashan, F-14/65, Model Town II, Delhi, 110009

8. Malik, Brigadier S.K., The Quranic Concept of War, Lahor, 1979, New Delhi reprint 1986.

9. Quotations 3,6,7,8 given under the subtitle: Opinions of some scholars on Islam are taken from a collection of reviews on 'Why I am not a Muslim', compiled by Goel, Sita Ram, Titled 'Freedom of Expression', published by Voice Of India, New Delhi.

10. Ram Swarup, Understanding Islam Through Hadis, Voice of India, New Delhi.

For More Information On The Nature Of Islam, Visit The Following Websites:

(The First Two Websites In the Bold Letters Provide Extensive List of Informative Sites on Islam)

1. http://listislam.freeweb-hosting.org/

2. http://www.listislam.cjb.net/

3. http://www.faithfreedom.org/

4. http://secularislam.org/

5. http://mypage.bluewin.ch/ameland/index.html

6. http://www.cilicia.com/armolO.html

7. http://www.danielpipes.org/

8. http://www.homa.org/

9. http://www.apostatesofislam.com/main.htm